firewall: Move the IPS after the NAT marking

This is because we might still land in the scenario where Suricata
crashes and NFQUEUE will simply ACCEPT all packets which will terminate
the processing of the mangle table.

Therefore the NFQUEUE rule should be the last one so that we never skip
any of the other processing.

Signed-off-by: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
This commit is contained in:
Michael Tremer
2024-09-10 11:37:38 +02:00
parent 2438c6c249
commit 525ff6d74d

View File

@@ -221,13 +221,6 @@ iptables_init() {
iptables -A FORWARD -i tun+ -j OVPNBLOCK
iptables -A FORWARD -o tun+ -j OVPNBLOCK
# IPS (Suricata) chains
iptables -t mangle -N IPS
for chain in PREROUTING POSTROUTING; do
iptables -t mangle -A "${chain}" -j IPS
done
# OpenVPN transfer network translation
iptables -t nat -N OVPNNAT
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j OVPNNAT
@@ -382,6 +375,13 @@ iptables_init() {
-m mark --mark "0x04000000/${NAT_MASK}" -j SNAT --to-source "${ORANGE_ADDRESS}"
fi
# IPS (Suricata) chains
iptables -t mangle -N IPS
for chain in PREROUTING POSTROUTING; do
iptables -t mangle -A "${chain}" -j IPS
done
# RED chain, used for the red interface
iptables -N REDINPUT
iptables -A INPUT -j REDINPUT